-
Bug
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Normal
-
NGS - Release Candidate 1
-
None
See http://test.musicbrainz.org/edit/13876399
Now it says, for (one) recording:
Old recording: X
New recording: Y
And for (one) work (note the plural too):
Old works: X
New work: Y
That makes it sound as if a new recording / work had been created for the merge, and is awkward. Could we please go back to our nicer sounding old ways?
Merge: X
Into: Y