This report, just like the Bad Amazon URLs one, has a "physiologically high" number of results (i.e. it will never reach 0 due to a high number of false positives).
Therefore, it would be much more useful if releases were sorted according to the date they were added to the database (newest first) rather than alphabetically.
Incidentally, that was the way it was sorted in Mason; the Bad Amazon URLs report is already sorted that way, too.